The fallacy of the middle ground*…

The god-proposition has been misrepresented…to produce confusion…

A member of a religious sect…is really saying…that although they have no verifiable evidence to back up their particular god-assertions…they still choose to promote them as facts…(in order to attract other members, and fleece them of their cash…!)

An atheist is simply responding…that because they
have no verifiable evidence to back up their god-assertions…they cannot rationally/truthfully/morally promote them as facts…only as baseless/unsupportable hypotheticals/imaginings…no more valid or provable, than a million others…If a god could ever be said that it actually exists…it could not be a
baseless/unsupportable hypothetical/imagined one…!

In such a simple dichotomy…there is no middle ground…A sect’s god can either be verifiable proven to exist…or it cannot…!

* “Argument to moderation…a false compromise…which asserts that the truth must be found as a compromise between two opposite positions…” 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation

image